Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Prime Minister Harper Meets with President Obama

The economy, the Buy American clause, the situation in Afghanistan, the environment and energy security could all be on the agenda Wednesday as Prime Minister Stephen Harper visits U.S. President Barack Obama in Washington.

The visit marks Harper's first trip to the White House since Obama assumed office. Harper will also meet with the leadership of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives on Wednesday.

While Harper's meeting with Obama is reported to be anywhere from 42 minutes to an hour in duration, Washington-based consultant and former Canadian ambassador Paul Frazer said every meeting between heads of government is of value, even if they are not lengthy.

The Buy American policy gives priority to U.S. iron, steel and other manufactured goods for use in state-level and municipal public works and building projects funded with taxpayer stimulus money. Canadian governments and businesses have railed against the policy.

Ironically coinciding with Harper's visit to the U.S. capital, some environmental groups staged protests Tuesday in Fort McMurray, Alta., and in Niagara Falls, N.Y.

In Alberta, about a dozen Greenpeace protesters forced a partial closure of Shell's Albian Sands site at Fort McMurray. They surrounded a huge dump truck with their own trucks and chained them together, and then some protesters climbed up on the dump truck and chained themselves to it. The ongoing protest is against what the environmental group sees as Canada's so-called "dirty oil" being exported to the U.S.

In Niagara Falls, activists hung a 21-metre banner showing arrows that point forward to a "clean energy future" and backward to "tarsands oil." After a few hours, protesters let go of the banner and were arrested.

Susan Casey-Lefkowitz of the U.S.-based Natural Resources Defence Council, a coalition of North American environmental groups, said that with Harper's visit to the U.S. the groups want to send a message to Canada "that it's important for both of our countries to be developing a cap on greenhouse gas emissions that cover all of the major emitting sectors," including the oilsands.

In some manner these two countries can make a difference. No country can do it entirely on there own...

13 comments:

  1. I WOULD like to see more moves on clean energy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. In Canada the tar sand unfortunately are vast with oil but as well the emmissions are one of the largest in the world.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ah, the emissions are high in Canada as well?

    ReplyDelete
  4. wishing everyone could just get along and make agreements that benefit all!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I could not agree more...for the most part I think we do...

    ReplyDelete
  6. We better start working cooperatively among all leadership...everywhere.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I understand Mr Harper announcedd yesteday that Canada will be withdrawing troops from Afghanistan in 2011...hopefully the US forces will not be far behind.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The sooner the better if you ask me.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The US government both parties needs to get of this "pork talk and hate" and get on with beginning as it has not began Sue.
    Where there is true leadership and accountability there is growth. France as you would know is one example of this.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Doug Canada was the first in as peace keepers and everyone went to Iraq and Canada's PM at the time along with Frances PM did not think it was an appropriate move. They were right meanwhile right now there is a base that the US shares that was set up by Canada and Prime Minister Harper extended time line from 2009 to 2011 and it may have cost him his position. Canadians as well as most everyone in the world have a majority of people that do not wish to have a presence any longer. That goes for many countries and really how I feel is that President Obama was primarily negotiating trade for troops.

    I hope it comes to a closure....sooner the better.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Ha! I just said that and I didn't even see what you wrote Cal - yes indeed the sooner the better...
    Intelligence via satellite, the surrounding bases and Obama is not alive but do we chase after or do we monitor. I say we monitor as we have post 9/11.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I don't mind if they monitor, but if they want to monitor my bedroom, I'm gonna charge! haha

    ReplyDelete